Turbot

Stock Status Score: 0

Turbot in the North Sea is fully fished and harvested sustainably.

Stock assessments are carried out by the International Council for Exploration of the Sea (ICES). This rating is based on the assessment published in 2026.

The stock assessment defines reference points for fishing pressure (F) and biomass (B). For fishing pressure, there is a target to keep F at or below Maximum Sustainable Yield (MSY). For biomass, there is no target. However, there is a trigger point (MSY Btrigger). Below this level, F should be reduced to allow the stock to increase. Because BMSY is not defined, the Good Fish Guide applies its own definition of 1.4 x MSY Btrigger.

Spawning stock biomass (SSB) declined sharply from 23,488 tonnes in 1981 to 3,130 tonnes in 1995, falling below MSY Btrigger (5,046 tonnes) in 1993 and below Blim (3,631 tonnes) in 1994. Between 1993 and 2007, SSB fluctuated around these reference points before recovering above MSY Btrigger in 2007, supported by improved recruitment and reduced fishing pressure. More recently, SSB fell below MSY Btrigger again during 2022–2024. However, in 2026, SSB is estimated at 6,500 tonnes, above MSY Btrigger but still below the BMSY proxy of 7,064 tonnes. Therefore, the stock is considered fully fished.

Fishing pressure (F) fluctuated throughout the time series, remaining above FMSY (0.386) between 1989 and 2005 before declining to below FMSY for most of the period from 2006 to 2015. In 2025, F is estimated at 0.22, well below FMSY, indicating that the stock is being harvested sustainably.

ICES advises that when the MSY approach is applied, catches in 2027 should be no more than 3,891 tonnes. This represents an 18.2% increase from the previous year, due to an increase in stock size resulting from high estimated recruitment in 2025.

Management of the Target Stock Score: 0.25

Alignment with Scientific Advice Score: 0.25

Monitoring, Control and Surveillance Score: 0.25

Few management measures in the North Sea are specifically designed for turbot. Nevertheless, the stock is currently abundant and appears to be harvested sustainably. Although a species-specific TAC was only introduced in 2024, catch limits have been set in line with scientific advice and have effectively controlled fishing mortality. The fishery has a well‑developed and effective Monitoring, Control, and Surveillance (MCS) system with reliable enforcement and low levels of IUU activity.

As a predominantly bycatch species, many of the management measures affecting North Sea turbot are designed primarily for mixed demersal and flatfish fisheries. The stock falls within the EU North Sea Multiannual Plan (MAP). However, this framework has not been formally adopted by Norway or the UK, resulting in incomplete management coverage across the stock area.

Turbot is mainly caught by trawlers targeting sole and plaice in the southern and central North Sea. Consequently, fishing mortality is controlled largely through technical measures applied to these fisheries, including gear selectivity requirements, cod-end mesh regulations and restrictions on beam length. The UK technical gear measures are as follows:

• Otter Trawls:
  • ICES Area 4b: 100mm mesh cod-end, 90mm square mesh panel.
  • ICES Area 4c: 80mm mesh cod-end, 80mm square mesh panel.
• Beam Trawls:
  • South of 55˚N: 80mm mesh cod-end, 180mm mesh headline panel.
  • 55˚N to 56˚N: 100mm mesh cod-end, 180mm mesh headline panel.
  • North of 56˚N: 120mm mesh cod-end, 180mm mesh headline panel.

An 80mm mesh size is commonly used to target marketable sole but also captures age-1 and age-2 turbot. As turbot generally mature at around age-4, the absence of a legal minimum conservation reference size (MCRS) in North Sea waters increases the risk of recruitment overexploitation, as immature fish may be removed before contributing to spawning biomass, potentially reducing reproductive output. However, Dutch Producer Organisations have historically applied a voluntary minimum market size, but this has decreased from 32cm to 25cm, between 2017 and 2026. While larger mesh sizes would likely reduce catches of juvenile turbot and improve stock stability, they would also reduce catches of marketable sole.

Additional protection is offered by the Plaice Box - a closed area established in 1989. It restricts vessels using towed gear with engine power over 300 horsepower and enforces a maximum aggregated beam length of 9m. This 9m limit is also in place within the UK’s 12 nautical mile zone. Although established to protect juvenile plaice, the closure could provide some indirect benefits for turbot.

Turbot falls under the Landing Obligation (LO), which aims to improve catch reporting, reduce unwanted catches and encourage more selective fishing practices. This means that turbot caught by otter trawl must generally be landed. However, survivability exemptions apply in some beam trawl fisheries in Scottish and EU waters of the North Sea, allowing certain catches to be returned to sea. The average discard rate from 2023 to 2025 is estimated at around 6.9% of catches.

Historically, turbot and brill were managed under a combined TAC covering ICES Subarea 4 and UK waters of Division 2a. This management did not align with ICES stock areas, limiting effective control of species-specific exploitation rates and potentially encouraging high-grading and overexploitation of the higher-value turbot stock. Since 2024, separate TACs have been established for turbot, improving species-specific management. Turbot TACs have been set below ICES advice since 2024, as they account for third-country catches (approximately 0.67% of removals). Catches in 2024 were below both the TAC and advised catch level. Catches also remained below advised levels under the previous combined TAC system.

Despite these measures, turbot remains largely managed within a mixed-fishery context. ICES notes that, under current fishing patterns, it is not possible to simultaneously achieve all single stock catch advice within the North Sea demersal fishery, primarily due to the zero-catch advice on cod making it a choke species. However, interactions between turbot and cod are considered limited, as fisheries catching turbot generally record negligible cod landings.

Monitoring, control and surveillance of UK fisheries are delivered through licensing, vessel tracking, statutory reporting, observer coverage, inspections and other monitoring systems. All commercial fishing vessels must hold a valid UK fishing licence to operate in UK waters, although exemptions may apply to some unpowered vessels under 10 metres. Depending on the area, target species and activity, additional permits or authorisations may also be required.

Vessel tracking requirements vary by vessel size, area and administration through Vessel Monitoring Systems (VMS) and, where applicable, inshore VMS (iVMS).

• Vessels 12 m and over must report their position every two hours via VMS.
• Vessels under 12 m report their position continuously where iVMS applies, or may operate full VMS where required by licence conditions or when fishing offshore.

Reporting of fishing activity, catches, landings, discards and port movements is mandatory, with logbooks supporting traceability:

• Vessels 12 m and over submit electronic logbooks under Council Regulation 1224/2009.
• Vessels 10–12 m (and under 10 m Producer Organisation vessels) use paper logbooks, updated daily and submitted within 48 hours of landing.
• Non-PO vessels under 10 m are generally exempt unless required by licence conditions.

UK vessels must also carry fishery observers when directed, providing independent verification of activity and catch. Remote Electronic Monitoring (REM), using cameras, sensors and positional data, is being increasingly deployed to improve data quality and support enforcement. Its rollout is supported by the Fisheries Act 2020 and the Joint Fisheries Statement.

Together, these measures help prevent illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing through vessel licensing, catch documentation, positional monitoring, statutory reporting and compliance checks. Enforcement action may include financial penalties, prosecution, licence suspension or other sanctions. The UK has committed to reducing IUU fishing and maintains a blacklist of vessels involved in such activities. This rating reflects full compliance with UK monitoring, control and surveillance requirements.

Similar monitoring, control and surveillance requirements apply to EU vessels under the EU Fisheries Control Regulation, including vessel tracking, electronic catch reporting, landing declarations, inspections and traceability requirements. The revised Regulation entered into force in January 2024 and introduces a phased requirement for REM with onboard cameras on EU vessels over 18 m identified as high risk for Landing Obligation non-compliance, alongside wider increases in digital reporting and traceability. Implementation and enforcement are undertaken by individual Member States, so observer coverage, inspection activity, enforcement effort and REM deployment can vary between countries and fisheries.

The Marine Conservation Society views Remote Electronic Monitoring (REM) with cameras as one of the most cost-effective tools for providing reliable fisheries data and aiding informed management decisions. Fully monitored fisheries enhance collaboration, data accuracy, stock recovery, and reduce impacts on marine wildlife and habitats. However, the full potential of REM may only be achieved when it tracks fishing location and documents catch and bycatch, particularly where vulnerable species and habitats are at risk. 

The Fisheries Act (2020) requires the development of Fisheries Management Plans (FMPs) (replacing EU Multi-Annual Plans) in the UK. 43 FMPs have been proposed and are at various stages of development and implementation, these should all be published by the end of 2028. FMPs have the potential to be very important tools for managing UK fisheries, although data limitations may delay them for some stocks. It is also essential the UK governments define and adopt a standardised approach or model across the four nations to a universally defined FMP design, to ensure the consistence, quality and coherence of all the proposal FMPs. 

The Marine Conservation Society is keen to see publicly available Fishery Management Plans for all commercially exploited stocks, especially where stocks are depleted, that include: 

• An overview of the fishery including current stock status, spatial coverage, current fishing methods and impacts 

• Targets for fishing pressure and biomass, and additional management when those targets are not being met, based on the best scientific evidence 

• Timeframes for stock recovery 

• Improved data collection, transparency, and accountability, supported by technologies such as Remote Electronic Monitoring (REM) 

• Consideration of wider environmental impacts of the fishery, including habitat impacts and minimising bycatch 

• Stakeholder engagement 

A Southern North Sea and Eastern Channel mixed flatfish FMP has been proposed, coordinated by Defra that incorporates this stock. At the time of writing, it is too soon to know whether proposed management measures will be effective in managing the stock. For more information about this FMP and expected progress and timelines, see [https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/fisheries-management-plans#published-fmps]. 

Capture Method Score: 0.5

Habitat Impacts: 0.5

Bycatch Impacts: 0.25

Vulnerable and ETP Species: 0.5

Ecosystems and Trophic Webs: 0.25

Otter trawls are likely to cause some damage to the seabed. As turbot is primarily a bycatch species in flatfish fisheries, its contribution to bycatch impacts on depleted species, such as North Sea cod, is likely to be limited, though not negligible. There is also bycatch of ETP species including prohibited blue skate, which could possibly be hindering recovery of the species. While the relatively low level of turbot removals is unlikely to affect food-web dynamics, otter trawling may contribute additional pressure to an ecosystem already altered by fishing and climate change.

Landings of turbot in the North Sea are from beam trawls (50%), bottom trawls (including otter trawls, 39%), and other gear types (11%). In 2025, a discard rate of 6.5% was recorded, an increase from 2024 (4.6%).

Demersal trawls have contact with the seabed resulting in penetration and abrasion of habitat features. The impact of trawling on the seabed depends on the location and scale in which trawling occurs. For instance, regions that are used to tidal and wave disturbances are less sensitive, whereas areas untrawled areas may be more vulnerable.

In the Greater North Sea ecoregion, impacts from bottom trawling are variable. Most fishing grounds consist of mud and sand, which are less susceptible to damage than habitats like reefs and seagrass beds. In 2022, it was estimated that 66% of the ecoregion shallower than 800m had been trawled, with 70% of this from depths of 0–200m and 27% from 200–800m. Areas with the highest fishing pressure include Skagerrak, Kattegat, and parts of the central North Sea.

There are several Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) within the North Sea that are designated to protect sensitive benthic habitats and species that may be vulnerable to bottom-towed fishing gears. While some sites, such as Dogger Bank, already have restrictions on bottom-towed gears, protection remains incomplete across the MPA network, with several sites only recently considered through the MMO's Stage 3 byelaw process. As such, some designated features may remain exposed to disturbance from bottom trawling, potentially limiting habitat recovery and the achievement of conservation objectives. Given the critical role MPAs play in recovering marine health and supporting ecosystem function, the Marine Conservation Society urges supply chain actors to verify whether their sources originate from within MPAs. If so, businesses should confirm that fishing operations are legally conducted and request evidence from the fishery or managing authority to ensure activities do not harm protected features or compromise conservation objectives.

Demersal otter trawls have the potential to take relatively high quantities of bycatch, including those of conservation concern. In the Greater North Sea ecoregion, bycatch from otter trawls can include marine mammals, seabirds, fish, elasmobranchs, and endangered, threatened and protected (ETP) species.

Bycatch data for UK and EU fisheries are often limited due to insufficient monitoring. However, some North Sea demersal trawl fisheries, which target flatfish species, are Marine Stewardship Council (MSC)-certified and record bycatch. This can provide an indication of the species likely to be encountered where certified and uncertified fleets overlap. Certified fleets have reported bycatch of North Sea cod, of which the southern substock is currently under zero-catch advice due to biomass being below safe biological limits. As turbot is primarily a bycatch species within flatfish fisheries rather than a target species, its direct contribution to cod bycatch and any associated impacts on stock recovery are likely to be limited. Measures to reduce cod bycatch are also in place in parts of the Scottish North Sea, including the UK North Sea Cod Avoidance Plan, which incorporates larger mesh sizes, seasonal closures and move-on requirements.

In terms of endangered, threatened and protected (ETP) species, the certified fleet reported a marked increase in blue skate and spurdog bycatch in 2024. However, the risks associated with these species differ. Blue skate, as part of the common skate complex, remains protected in UK and EU waters, with fishing, retention, transhipment and landing prohibited, and is managed under a zero-catch approach. The recent increase in blue skate bycatch suggests that the demersal fishery could possibly hinder the recovery of the species. By contrast, spurdog biomass has recovered above MSY Btrigger and current fishing mortality is considered sustainable, indicating that incidental catches in the North Sea demersal fishery are unlikely to be contributing to population decline.

Turbot occupies a mid- to upper-trophic-level position in the North Sea food web, feeding primarily on crustaceans and small fish while also serving as prey for marine mammals and larger predatory fish. The ecosystem has changed in recent decades due to both climate change and fishing pressure. Rising sea temperatures have altered trophic pathways through reductions in zooplankton abundance, while declines in key forage species such as sandeels have contributed to shifts in food-web structure and energy transfer.

Compared with the major flatfish fisheries targeting sole and plaice, catches of turbot are relatively low, suggesting the fishery is unlikely to exert a substantial influence on ecosystem dynamics. However, turbot is commonly caught using trawls, with relatively high-impacts relating to benthic disturbance and multi-species bycatch. Much of the fishery operates in the southern North Sea, where seabed habitats are naturally exposed to high levels of physical disturbance and are therefore considered less sensitive to trawling impacts than those in the north-eastern North Sea. Nevertheless, habitat alteration and incidental catch associated with trawling may add further pressure to an already altered ecosystem.