Dover sole
Solea solea
What to check for
Location
Location
Location refers to two things:
- Where the fish population or stock lives, e.g., North Sea, or South Pacific.
- Who is managing the fishery. If it says “All areas”, this means that our scoring for management covers the same area as the fish stock.
English Channel (West): All areas
Technical location
Technical location
A global system is used to split the ocean into different zones, areas, and subdivisions. Each zone is indicated by a number and/or letter. By law, this must be shown on all unprocessed seafood sold in the EU and UK, alongside the fishing method used to catch it. Look for these details on the packet to match your seafood to our ratings.
7e: English Channel (West)
Caught by
Caught by
Net (gill or fixed)
Gillnetting uses a net, suspended in the water, that is anchored to the seabed. It is kept vertical by buoys, to create a wall of netting that fish swim into and become entangled. The mesh size and length of time the nets are left at sea varies, depending on where they are fishing and what they are targeting.
Net (gill or fixed)
Rating summary
Sole in the western English Channel is fully fished and the stock is harvested sustainably. Sole is well managed through a combination of the Landing Obligation, minimum conservation reference sizes, and technical measures. Although catches exceeded scientific advice once in the past five years, they remained below advised limits in the most recent year. The fishery has a well‑developed and effective Monitoring, Control, and Surveillance (MCS) system with reliable enforcement and low levels of IUU activity. Although fixed nets have relatively low impacts on benthic habitats, they can generate high levels of bycatch. Within this mixed demersal fishery, there is a small risk of bycatch of gadoid species under zero catch advice. There is also bycatch of harbour porpoise (an ETP species), with populations declining in the region. Bycatch of higher-trophic-level predators may contribute to wider food-web and ecosystem change.
Rating last updated July 2026
How we worked out this Rating
Please note this rating uses our new methodology.
Stock status
The size and health of a fish population, or 'stock', that is being targeted by fishermen is a crucial indicator of whether a fishery is sustainable. If the stock is too small to withstand fishing, it is at risk of crashing. We look at how big the stock is, and how much pressure there is from fishing, to assess this. The target level that many fisheries aim for is 'Maximum Sustainable Yield' - the most fish that can be caught year after year whilst keeping the population at a healthy size.
Stock Status Score: 0
Sole in the western English Channel is fully fished and harvested sustainably.
Stock assessments are carried out by the International Council for Exploration of the Sea (ICES). This rating is based on the assessment published in 2026.
The stock assessment defines reference points for fishing pressure (F) and biomass (B). For fishing pressure, there is a target to keep F at or below Maximum Sustainable Yield (MSY). For biomass, there is no target. However, there is a trigger point (MSY Btrigger). Below this level, F should be reduced to allow the stock to increase. Because BMSY is not defined, the Good Fish Guide applies its own definition of 1.4 x MSY Btrigger.
Spawning stock biomass (SSB) declined from a peak in 1980 before fluctuating around MSY Btrigger (2,900 tonnes) from the early 1990s to 2009. The stock then increased steadily, reaching a second peak in 2020, before declining in recent years. In 2026, SSB is estimated at 3,762 tonnes, which is above MSY Btrigger but below the BMSY proxy (4,060 tonnes). The stock is therefore considered to be fully fished.
Fishing mortality (F) increased during the 1980s and remained around or above FMSY (0.29) for much of the early time series. Fishing pressure declined between 2009 and 2020, remaining below FMSY throughout this period, but increased again from 2021 to 2024. In 2025, F was estimated at 0.28, just below FMSY, indicating that the stock is currently being harvested at a sustainable level.
ICES advises that when the MSY approach is applied, catches in 2027 should be no more than 1,017 tonnes. This is a 16.2% decrease in advice from the previous year, which reflects a decline in the stock and a downwards rescaling of stock size.
Management
Good management is vital to be sure that fishing doesn't cause fish populations to decline. We look at whether regulations follow the best available scientific advice, how well compliance is monitored and enforced, and whether this is effective in maintaining healthy fish stocks.
Management of the Target Stock Score: 0
Alignment with Scientific Advice Score: 0.5
Monitoring, Control and Surveillance Score: 0.25
Sole in the western English Channel is well managed through a combination of the Landing Obligation, minimum conservation reference sizes, and technical measures. Although catches exceeded scientific advice once in the past five years, they remained below advised limits in the most recent year. The fishery has a well‑developed and effective Monitoring, Control, and Surveillance (MCS) system with reliable enforcement and low levels of IUU activity.
The sole fishery in the western English Channel is managed through Total Allowable Catches (TACs) and a range of technical measures. While the stock is covered by the EU Multiannual Plan (MAP), there is currently no joint management plan agreed between the EU and the UK.
Sole is caught in a mixed fishery with plaice in this area. Fishing mortality for both species is affected by technical management measures, including gear selectivity requirements and mesh size regulations. The current UK technical gear measures are as follows:
- Beam Trawls: 80mm mesh cod-end.
- Otter Trawls: 100mm mesh cod-end, with 100mm square mesh panel (exception for area east of 5°W).
- Nets: 100mm mesh size.
Sole in the western English Channel has been subject to the Landing Obligation (LO) since 2020. The LO was introduced to improve catch reporting, reduce unwanted catches, and encourage more selective fishing practices. However, some exemptions apply to this fishery, including de minimis exemptions for beam trawls fitted with Flemish panels and for gill and trammel net fisheries, allowing certain catches to be returned to sea. A minimum conservation reference size (MCRS) of 24 cm applies throughout the fishery. Discard rates remain relatively low, averaging 0.4% annually between 2020 and 2022, with a slight increase to 2.8% in 2025.
The stock is managed through a total allowable catch (TAC) system. Between 2020 and 2026, TACs were set in line with ICES catch advice in all years except 2024. As a result, catches in 2024 reached 111% of the advised limit. In 2025, the TAC was again aligned with ICES advice at 1,151 tonnes, while catches remained below this level at 1,052 tonnes (91.4% of the TAC).
The western English Channel sole fishery overlaps with both the Celtic Seas and Greater North Sea ecoregions, where sole forms part of mixed demersal fisheries. ICES notes that, under current fishing patterns, it is not possible to simultaneously achieve all single-stock catch advice within either ecoregion, due to choke species like cod, haddock, and whiting. Therefore, choke species are largely overlooked. However, the interaction between sole fisheries and these species is considered limited.
Sole is more commonly caught alongside plaice, which is not included in the mixed-fishery advice. Given that the plaice stock in this area has declined substantially over the past decade and has remained below the MSY Btrigger proxy (Itrigger) since 2019, any changes in sole fishery management or fishing effort could influence plaice catches and potentially affect the stock's recovery.
Monitoring, control and surveillance of UK fisheries are delivered through licensing, vessel tracking, statutory reporting, observer coverage, inspections and other monitoring systems. All commercial fishing vessels must hold a valid UK fishing licence to operate in UK waters, although exemptions may apply to some unpowered vessels under 10 metres. Depending on the area, target species and activity, additional permits or authorisations may also be required.
Vessel tracking requirements vary by vessel size, area and administration through Vessel Monitoring Systems (VMS) and, where applicable, inshore VMS (iVMS).
- Vessels 12 m and over must report their position every two hours via VMS.
- Vessels under 12 m report their position continuously where iVMS applies, or may operate full VMS where required by licence conditions or when fishing offshore.
Reporting of fishing activity, catches, landings, discards and port movements is mandatory, with logbooks supporting traceability:
- Vessels 12 m and over submit electronic logbooks under Council Regulation 1224/2009.
- Vessels 10–12 m (and under 10 m Producer Organisation vessels) use paper logbooks, updated daily and submitted within 48 hours of landing.
- Non-PO vessels under 10 m are generally exempt unless required by licence conditions.
UK vessels must also carry fishery observers when directed, providing independent verification of activity and catch. Remote Electronic Monitoring (REM), using cameras, sensors and positional data, is being increasingly deployed to improve data quality and support enforcement. Its rollout is supported by the Fisheries Act 2020 and the Joint Fisheries Statement.
Together, these measures help prevent illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing through vessel licensing, catch documentation, positional monitoring, statutory reporting and compliance checks. Enforcement action may include financial penalties, prosecution, licence suspension or other sanctions. The UK has committed to reducing IUU fishing and maintains a blacklist of vessels involved in such activities. This rating reflects full compliance with UK monitoring, control and surveillance requirements.
The Marine Conservation Society views Remote Electronic Monitoring (REM) with cameras as one of the most cost-effective tools for providing reliable fisheries data and aiding informed management decisions. Fully monitored fisheries enhance collaboration, data accuracy, stock recovery, and reduce impacts on marine wildlife and habitats. However, the full potential of REM may only be achieved when it tracks fishing location and documents catch and bycatch, particularly where vulnerable species and habitats are at risk.
The Fisheries Act (2020) requires the development of Fisheries Management Plans (FMPs) (replacing EU Multi-Annual Plans) in the UK. 43 FMPs have been proposed and are at various stages of development and implementation, these should all be published by the end of 2028. FMPs have the potential to be very important tools for managing UK fisheries, although data limitations may delay them for some stocks. It is also essential the UK governments define and adopt a standardised approach or model across the four nations to a universally defined FMP design, to ensure the consistence, quality and coherence of all the proposal FMPs.
The Marine Conservation Society is keen to see publicly available Fishery Management Plans for all commercially exploited stocks, especially where stocks are depleted, that include:
- An overview of the fishery including current stock status, spatial coverage, current fishing methods and impacts
- Targets for fishing pressure and biomass, and additional management when those targets are not being met, based on the best scientific evidence
- Timeframes for stock recovery
- Improved data collection, transparency, and accountability, supported by technologies such as Remote Electronic Monitoring (REM)
- Consideration of wider environmental impacts of the fishery, including habitat impacts and minimising bycatch
- Stakeholder engagement
A Celtic Sea and Western Channel demersal FMP has been proposed, coordinated by Defra and the Welsh Government that incorporates this stock. At the time of writing, it is too soon to know whether proposed management measures will be effective in managing the stock. For more information about this FMP and expected progress and timelines, see [https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/fisheries-management-plans#published-fmps].
Capture method
Environmental impacts of fishing vary hugely, depending on the method used and where it's happening. We look at whether the fishing gear being used could have an effect on seabed habitats, and if so, how severe might this be. We also review whether it catches any other species by accident (bycatch), and what effect this might have on those species - especially if they're Endangered, Threatened, or Protected.
Capture Method Score: 0.75
Habitat Impacts: 0
Bycatch Impacts: 0.25
Vulnerable and ETP Species: 0.75
Ecosystems and Trophic Webs: 0.5
Although fixed nets have relatively low impacts on benthic habitats, they can generate high levels of bycatch. Within this mixed demersal fishery, there is risk of bycatch of gadoid species under zero catch advice, with interactions limited but not insignificant. Fixed net fisheries in the region are also associated with elevated bycatch of harbour porpoises, an ETP species, with populations declining in the region. While sole landings in the region have remained relatively stable, bycatch of higher-trophic-level predators may contribute to wider food-web and ecosystem change.
The majority of western English Channel sole landings come from beam trawls (68%), followed by otter trawls (18%), gillnets (9%), and other gears (5%). In 2025, total catches were 1,053 tonnes.
Fixed nets, consisting of vertical net(s) suspended between a float line and a weighted ground line, have minimal impact on benthic habitats as they cause little disturbance to the seabed. However, they are associated with high levels of bycatch.
There are several Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) within the western English Channel that are designated to protect sensitive benthic habitats and vulnerable species. However, static-net fishing remains permitted in most offshore MPAs overlapping this fishery. In inshore waters, additional restrictions on static-net fisheries may apply through local IFCA byelaws. As some MPAs encompass important nursery grounds for commercial and vulnerable species, restrictions on all fishing gears, including static nets, can provide additional conservation benefits to mobile species.
Fixed nets are associated with bycatch of marine mammals, seabirds, fish, elasmobranchs and endangered, threatened and protected (ETP) species. Globally, gillnet fisheries are recognised as posing one of the greatest threats to cetaceans, particularly small coastal species. Within the Celtic Seas ecoregion, harbour porpoises are the cetacean species most frequently affected by net bycatch. Available evidence suggests that current bycatch levels are unsustainable, exceeding potential biological removal thresholds, and contributing to population declines in the region. Harbour porpoises are listed by OSPAR as threatened and/or declining in the Greater North Sea and Celtic Seas and are protected under UK and EU legislation, which includes requirements to minimise bycatch. Other species commonly caught in fixed nets include grey seals, and guillemots.
Sole is caught as part of a mixed fishery within the Greater North Sea and Celtic Sea ecoregions. In the Celtic Sea region, cod, haddock, and whiting are choke species as they are subject to zero-catch advice. However, these species may still be bycaught within the sole fishery. That said, catches of these species have declined steadily over the past decade, and nets accounted for only 1-7% of their landings in 2025. Consequently, interactions between the sole fishery and these stocks are considered limited, and the fishery’s direct contribution to the bycatch and associated impacts on stock recovery of these species is likely to be limited. More common bycatch species in this fishery include anglerfish, plaice, lemon sole, and cuttlefish.
Sole occupy a mid-trophic-level position in the food web, feeding mainly on benthic invertebrates and serving as prey for larger fish and marine mammals. The English Channel ecosystem has changed considerably over the past century, reflecting a pattern of “fishing down marine food webs”. Since the 1920s, higher-trophic-level species such as gadoids and elasmobranchs have declined, while lower-trophic-level invertebrates have become more prominent in landings. Although the loss of top predators can alter food-web structure and ecosystem functioning, landings of sole and other flatfish have remained relatively stable, with western English Channel sole landings averaging around 1,000 tonnes since the early 2000s. As such, the fishery is unlikely to be a major driver of ongoing ecosystem change through the removal of sole. However, bycatch of higher-trophic-level species, particularly harbour porpoises, may contribute to broader food-web and ecosystem change.
References
Calderan, S. and Leaper, R., 2019. Review of harbour porpoise bycatch in UK waters and recommendations for management. January 2019, WWF. Available at https://www.wwf.org.uk/sites/default/files/2019-04/Review_of_harbour_porpoise_in_UK_waters_2019.pdf [Accessed on 14.07.2026]
Eigaard, O.R., Bastardie, F., Breen, M., Dinesen, G.E., Hintzen, N.T., Laffargue, P., Mortensen, L.O., Nielsen, J.R., Nilsson, H.C., O'Neill, F.G., Polet, H., Reid, D.G., Sala, A., SkOld, M., Smith, C., Sorensen, T.K., Tully, O., Zengin, M., Rijnsdorp, A.D., 2016. Estimating seabed pressure from demersal trawls, seines, and dredges based on gear design and dimensions. ICES Journal of Marine Science, Volume 73, Issue suppl 1. Pages i27-i43. Available at https://academic.oup.com/icesjms/article/73/suppl_1/i27/2573989 [Accessed on 14.07.2026].
Froese, R., Pauly, D. 2026. FishBase. Common sole, Solea solea. Available at: Solea solea, Common sole : fisheries, aquaculture, gamefish, aquarium [Accessed on 14.07.2026].
GOV.UK. 2025. Technical Conservation and Landing Obligation rules and regulations 2025. Available at: Technical Conservation and Landing Obligation rules and regulations 2025 - GOV.UK [Accessed on 14.07.2026].
GOV.UK. 2025. Marine protected areas Stage 3 Consultation. Available at: Marine protected areas Stage 3 Consultation - GOV.UK [Accessed on 14.07.2026].
Hiddink, J., Jennings, S., Sciberras, M., Szostek, C.L., Hughes, K.M., Ellis, N., Rijnsdorp, A.D., McConnaughey, R.A., Mazor, T., Hilborn, R., Collie, J.S., Pitcher, C.R., Amoroso, R.O., Parma, A.M., Suuronen, P. and Kaiser, M.J. 2017. Global analysis of depletion and recovery of seabed biota after bottom trawling disturbance. PNAS. 114:31, pp. 8301-8306. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1618858114.
ICES. 2026. Sole (Solea solea) in Division 7.e (western English Channel). In Report of the ICES Advisory Committee, 2026. ICES Advice 2026, sol.27.7e. https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.advice.30932414
ICES. 2026. Whiting (Merlangius merlangus) in divisions 7.b-c and 7.e-k (southern Celtic Seas and eastern English Channel). In Report of the ICES Advisory Committee, 2026. ICES Advice 2026, whg.27.7b-ce-k. https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.advice.30932462
ICES. 2026. Cod (Gadus morhua) in divisions 7.e–k (western English Channel and southern Celtic Seas). In Report of the ICES Advisory Committee, 2026. ICES Advice 2026, cod.27.7e–k. https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.advice.30932036
ICES. 2026. Haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus) in Divisions 7.b-k (southern Celtic Seas and English Channel). In Report of the ICES Advisory Committee, 2025. ICES Advice 2025, had.27.7b-k. https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.advice.30932072
ICES. 2025. Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) in Division 7.e (western English Channel). Replacing advice provided in June 2024. In Report of the ICES Advisory Committee, 2025. ICES Advice 2025, ple.27.7e. https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.advice.29412776
ICES. 2025 Celtic Seas Ecosystem – fisheries Overview. In Report of the ICES Advisory Committee, 2025. ICES Advice 2025, section 7.2. https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.advice.30710879
ICES. 2025. Celtic Sea mixed fisheries considerations. In Report of the ICES Advisory Committee, 2025. ICES Advice 2025. https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.advice.30374749
ICES. 2025. Greater North Sea ecoregion – fisheries overview In Report of the ICES Advisory Committee, 2025. ICES Advice 2025, section 9.2. https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.advice.30710897
ICES. 2025. Greater North Sea mixed fisheries considerations. In Report of the ICES Advisory Committee, 2025. ICES Advice 2025. https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.advice.30316027
ICES. 2024. Greater North Sea ecoregion – Ecosystem overview. In Report of the ICES Advisory Committee, 2024. ICES Advice 2024, Section 7.1, https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.advice.25714239
ICES. 2024. Celtic Seas Ecoregion – Ecosystem overview. In Report of the ICES Advisory Committee, 2024. ICES Advice 2024, Section 7.1, https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.advice.25713033
ICES. 2023. Working Group for the Celtic Seas Ecoregion (WGCSE). ICES Scientific Reports. 5:32. 1370 pp. https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.22268980
Irvine, H.E., Pinn, E.H., Smith, I.P. and Lart, W., 2024. Harbour porpoise bycatch: Determining spatial distribution of risk to inform management measures. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 34(11), p.e70003.
Kennelly, S. J. & Broadhurst, M. K., 2021. A review of bycatch reduction in demersal fish trawls. Rev Fish Biol Fisheries 31, 289–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-021-09644-0.
Kynoch, R., Fryer, R. & Neat, F., 2015. A simple technical measure to reduce bycatch and discard of skates and sharks in mixed-species bottom-trawl fisheries. ICES J Mar Sci,72(6):1861.
Lynam, C.P., Llope, M., Möllmann, C., Helaouët, P., Bayliss-Brown, G.A. and Stenseth, N.C., 2017. Interaction between top-down and bottom-up control in marine food webs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(8), pp.1952-1957.
Molfese, C., Beare, D. and Hall-Spencer, J.M., 2014. Overfishing and the replacement of demersal finfish by shellfish: an example from the English Channel. PloS one, 9(7), p.e101506.
OSPAR, 2023. Marine Mammal By-catch. Available at: Marine Mammal By-catch [Accessed on 14.07.26]
Sharpe, M. & Berggren, P. 2023. Phocoena phocoena (Europe assessment). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2023: e.T17027A219010660.
Silva, F., Ellis, J. & Catchpole, T., 2012. Species composition of skates (Rajidae) in commercial fisheries around the British Isles and their discarding patterns. J Fish Biol., 80:1678–1703.
van Denderen, P. Bolam, S., Hiddink, J.G., Jennings, S., Kenny, A., Rijnsdorp, A., and van Kooten, T., 2015. Similar effects of bottom trawling and natural disturbance on composition and function of benthic communities across habitats. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2015;541:31–43.
Sustainable swaps
Learn more about how we calculate our sustainability ratings.
How our ratings work
Add impact to your inbox
Join the movement: get updates on the issues you care about.
We'll email you inspiring stories about the work we're doing to save and recover our oceans, and news about our urgent campaigns for positive change.