Atlantic cod
Gadus morhua
What to check for
Location
Location
Location refers to two things:
- Where the fish population or stock lives, e.g., North Sea, or South Pacific.
- Who is managing the fishery. If it says “All areas”, this means that our scoring for management covers the same area as the fish stock.
Iceland: Certified fleets only
Technical location
Technical location
A global system is used to split the ocean into different zones, areas, and subdivisions. Each zone is indicated by a number and/or letter. By law, this must be shown on all unprocessed seafood sold in the EU and UK, alongside the fishing method used to catch it. Look for these details on the packet to match your seafood to our ratings.
5a: Iceland Grounds
Caught by
Caught by
Hook & line (longline)
Longlining uses a long fishing line with baited hooks. There can be hundreds of hooks on one line. The type and size of the hook, the bait used, and the position of the longline (at the surface, mid-water, or on the sea floor) vary depending on what fishers are trying to catch.
Hook & line (longline)
Certification
Marine Stewardship Council (MSC)
The Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) is an independent, international non-profit organisation that was founded in 1997 to find a solution to the problem of overfishing. Together with scientists, fishery experts and conservation groups, the MSC has developed an environmental standard to assess and reward fisheries that are well-managed and sustainable. Consumers can identify products from certified sustainable fisheries by the blue MSC ecolabel.
Marine Stewardship Council (MSC)
Rating summary
Icelandic cod is abundant and not subject to overfishing. There is a management plan in place, which has reduced fishing pressure. However, catches have still consistently been above advice in recent years. Some Icelandic cod is caught by longlining. This method can have a bycatch of vulnerable species, including spotted wolffish. All Icelandic cod landed by the Icelandic fleet is MSC certified. Certification is conditional on having a strategy to avoid bycatch, and better data to prove that it is not having a detrimental impact on Endangered, Threatened or Protected species.
Rating last updated July 2026.
How we worked out this Rating
Please note this rating uses our new methodology.
Stock status
The size and health of a fish population, or 'stock', that is being targeted by fishermen is a crucial indicator of whether a fishery is sustainable. If the stock is too small to withstand fishing, it is at risk of crashing. We look at how big the stock is, and how much pressure there is from fishing, to assess this. The target level that many fisheries aim for is 'Maximum Sustainable Yield' - the most fish that can be caught year after year whilst keeping the population at a healthy size.
Stock Status Score: 0
Icelandic cod is abundant and not subject to overfishing.
Stock assessments are carried out annually by the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES). The most recent assessment was published in 2026 using data up to 2026. The next assessment is expected in 2027.
The stock assessment defines reference points for harvest rate (HR) and biomass (B). For the harvest rate, there is a target to keep HR at or below Maximum Sustainable Yield (MSY). For biomass, there is no target. However, there is a trigger point (MSY BTrigger). Below this level, HR should be reduced to allow the stock to increase. Because BMSY is not defined, the Good Fish Guide applies its own definition of 1.4 x MSY BTrigger.
Catches peaked at over 500,000 tonnes in the 1950s, gradually declining to around 150,000t in the 2000s, and are currently around 220,000t.
The spawning-stock biomass (SSB) was at low levels throughout the 1970s to early 2000s, close to the lowest safe biological limit (Blim: 125,000 tonnes). It increased to over 530,000 tonnes in 2017 and has since declined to 377,277t in 2026. However, SSB remains 42% above MSY BTrigger (265,000t) and slightly above the GFG proxy for BMSY (371,000t). Therefore, the stock is not considered overfished.
The Harvest Rate (HR) was high between the 1950s and 2000s, exceeding levels associated with Maximum Sustainable Yield (HR MSY, 0.22). However, HR has been below HR MSY since 2022, in 2025 HR was 0.198, this is 90% of HR MSY and indicates that the stock is not currently subject to overfishing.
Based on Iceland's management plan, catches in the fishing year 2026/2027 should be no more than 201,674 tonnes. This is a slight decrease to the advice from the previous year.
Management
Good management is vital to be sure that fishing doesn't cause fish populations to decline. We look at whether regulations follow the best available scientific advice, how well compliance is monitored and enforced, and whether this is effective in maintaining healthy fish stocks.
Management of the Target Stock Score: 0.25
Alignment with Scientific Advice Score: 1
Monitoring, Control and Surveillance Score: 0
There is a management plan in place, which has successfully reduced fishing pressure. All Icelandic cod landed by the Icelandic fleet is MSC certified. Catch limits have consistently been aligned with scientific advice, however total catches have been above advice and limits for the last 5 years and thus are not effectively controlled. Additionally, management is not adequately controlling the impacts of the fishery on bycatch species. Fully comprehensive monitoring, control, and surveillance with highly effective enforcement and negligible IUU fishing activity.
The ISF Iceland Cod fishery is the primary MSC‑certified fishery for Icelandic cod and holds certification without conditions, indicating that no improvements to management are required. Fisheries management and legislative implementation fall under the responsibility of the Icelandic Ministry of Industries and Innovation (MII).
Iceland has strengthened management measures across major commercial stocks, including cod, haddock, saithe, redfish and herring. These improvements have contributed to reduced fishing mortality, increased stock sizes and lower pressure on benthic habitats.
A Harvest Control Rule (HCR) is in place for cod and is reviewed every five years. ICES considers the HCR precautionary, as it aims to maintain the stock at Maximum Sustainable Yield (MSY). The HCR forms the basis for setting annual catch limits.
Several additional management measures support stock protection. Fishing is temporarily prohibited in areas where more than 25% of the catch (by number) is small cod under 55 cm, although scientific advice suggests these short closures may have limited effect on juvenile protection. Cod spawning grounds are closed for two to three weeks during the spawning season. The minimum codend mesh size in trawl fisheries has been set at 135 mm since 1998, larger than typical UK and European standards, with the intention of reducing catches of undersized fish. Discarding unwanted fish at sea is prohibited, although ICES estimates that approximately 1% of cod landings are still discarded, with indications that this may be increasing. There is no minimum landing size for cod in ICES Division 5.a, but economic penalties apply to landings valued below a minimum threshold to discourage retention of small fish.
The HCR sets annual Total Allowable Catches (TACs), and Iceland has aligned TACs with ICES scientific advice since 2010/11. Landings have exceeded TACs in all but two years since 1988, generally by less than 10%. Between 2018 and 2022, landings averaged 264,010 tonnes, approximately 4% above the average TAC of 254,677 tonnes.
The Icelandic government attributes TAC overages to several factors: quota transfers between years or species, allowances for undersized fish, catches by foreign vessels operating within Iceland’s EEZ (primarily Norway and the Faroe Islands), and research catches. TACs apply only to Icelandic fleets, which account for roughly 99% of total catch. Iceland’s scientific advisory body continues to recommend that all fishing mortality, including foreign catches, be incorporated into TAC-setting decisions.
Foreign access agreements allow Faroese vessels to take up to 5,600 tonnes of demersal species annually within Icelandic waters, including a maximum of 1,200 tonnes of cod. Norwegian catches also occur under bilateral agreements. Historically, these foreign catches were not included in the Ministry’s TAC allocation to Icelandic vessels.
According to the 2023 ICES stock assessment, fishing pressure on Icelandic cod is now below MSY, and the stock is no longer subject to overfishing.
Iceland maintains an extensive Monitoring, Control and Surveillance. Key elements include publication of individual vessel quotas, independent verification and recording of landings, gear restrictions and inspections, and mandatory electronic catch logs.
The Icelandic Coast Guard has authority to intercept and inspect vessels operating within the EEZ. Satellite-based vessel monitoring (AIS and VMS) is mandatory for all vessels, regardless of size, providing continuous oversight of fishing activity.
A development with MCS within this fishery is the rapid expansion of drone‑based monitoring, which began experimentally in 2022 and now allows inspectors to detect anomalies, observe gear and identify discarding through live‑streamed footage. New long‑range drones introduced in 2025 can operate up to 20 nautical miles offshore, apply AI to analyse fishing activity and reduce the need for inshore physical inspections. Iceland also led a Nordic Council project on remote fisheries monitoring, and infringement reporting increased to 371 cases in 2024, with discarding and weighing irregularities accounting for most sanctions.
Capture method
Environmental impacts of fishing vary hugely, depending on the method used and where it's happening. We look at whether the fishing gear being used could have an effect on seabed habitats, and if so, how severe might this be. We also review whether it catches any other species by accident (bycatch), and what effect this might have on those species - especially if they're Endangered, Threatened, or Protected.
Capture Method Score: 0.5
Habitat Impacts: 0.25
Bycatch Impacts: 0.25
Vulnerable and ETP Species: 0.5
Ecosystems and Trophic Webs: 0.25
Some Icelandic cod is caught by longlining. This method can have a bycatch of vulnerable species. In this fishery, bycatch of spotted wolffish is of concern. There are a number of measures in place to reduce bycatch, but more needs to be done to ensure they are fully effective.
100% of Icelandic cod landed by the Icelandic fleet is MSC certified. Around 50% of cod catches are from bottom trawling, 30% from longlining and the remainder from gillnetting, demersal seine and hooks or jigs. The MSC certification is conditional on having a strategy to avoid bycatch, and better data to prove that it is not having a detrimental impact on Endangered, Threatened or Protected species.
The main concern is the bycatch of seabirds. Records of interactions with the longline fishery include great black-backed gull and northern fulmar. Both are listed as Least Concern on the IUCN Red List. However, the Icelandic great black-backed gull population is 50% of the size in the 1970s. Longline bycatch of around 52 individuals per year could account for around 20% of the decline, but population dynamics are variable and it is unclear what the causes are. Northern fulmar is declining rapidly. Causes could include sandeel declines, as this is important prey. Longline bycatch of around 1,000 per year could account for 3% of the decline.
Some mitigation measures are in place, but it is unclear if best practice is being followed. The Agreement on the Conservation of Albatrosses and Petrels (ACAP) recommends line weighting to sink baited hooks and reduce their availability to seabirds, bird scaring lines, and setting longlines at night.
Vulnerable fish species include the spotted wolffish, which has been steadily declining and is now at its lowest historical level following recruitment failure. It is mainly caught as bycatch and has a recommended catch limit of around 300t. It survives well after being released, and so over-quota wolffish are recommended to be released. However, the certification report suggests a bycatch in the certified cod longline and trawl fleets of over 600 tonnes each in 2020/21, which appears to account for almost all catches of this species and totals 4 times the recommended limit. It seems likely that this fishery is contributing to the unsustainable fishing pressure on this species and could be preventing recovery.
Sharks and skates are taken as bycatch in Icelandic fisheries, but the status of many stocks is unknown. There are records of Greenland shark and spurdog bycatch; spurdog is protected under Icelandic law.
There was no reported marine mammal bycatch in this fishery between 2014 and 2017.
Longlining uses baited hooks to attract fish. The species used for bait in this fishery are herring, Pacific saury and various squid species. The sources of squid do not appear to be well known. It is important to monitor bait use to ensure it does not have an impact on bait species.
Longline fisheries have much lower impact on habitats than bottom-towed gear such as trawls. However, if they are bottom longlines using anchoring systems, or are dragged across the seabed during fishing and hauling, they can snag on or otherwise affect vulnerable species such as corals and sponges, which can be slow to recover. Fishing grounds for Icelandic cod vary, depending on the gear type used, but are generally between 100m-500m deep, so there is a low risk of impacts on vulnerable deep-sea habitats (below 600m). Longlining is most common in coastal areas, with an average depth of 160m. There are designated MPAs in Icelandic waters, some of which are closed to all fishing to protect fish spawning areas or habitats. In addition, vessels must move 2nm away from a location if a certain amount of live sponges or corals have been caught. Vessel locations are monitored through AIS and VMS, regardless of vessel size.
Cod is on of the most important predator species in Icelandic waters. The impact of removals of this species by fishing is unclear.
References
ACAP, 2026. ACAP 2026 Summary Best Practice Advice for Reducing the Impact of Demersal Longline Fisheries on Seabirds Reviewed at the Fifteenth Meeting of the Advisory Committee Swakopmund, Namibia, 1 – 5 June 2026. Available at https://www.acap.aq/bycatch-mitigation/mitigation-advice/5298-acap-demersal-ll-summary-bpa/file [Accessed on 14.07.2026].
Clark, M., Althaus, F., Schlacher, T., Williams, A., Bowden, D., Rowden, A., 2016. The impacts of deep-sea fisheries on benthic communities: a review. ICES Journal of Marine Science 73: suppl_1. P. i51–i69. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsv123.
Government of Iceland, 2018. Management Strategy and Harvest Control Rules Available at https://www.government.is/news/article/2018/05/15/Haddock/ [Accessed on 14.07.2026].
Hønneland, G., Scarcella, G. and Tsitsika, E., 2025. Marine Stewardship Council Review of Information Third Surveillance Report. ISF Iceland Cod. Carried out by LRQA (Seafood) Limited on behalf of the Icelandic Sustainable Fisheries (ISF). December 2025. Available at: https://fisheries.msc.org/en/fisheries/isf-iceland-cod/@@assessments [Accessed on 13.07.2026].
Hønneland, G., Polonio, V., Scarcella, G. and Tsitsika, E., 2022. Marine Stewardship Council Public Certification Report (Reassessment): ISF Iceland cod. Carried out by Global Trust Certification Ltd. on behalf of Icelandic Sustainable Fisheries (ISF). 21 December 2022. Available at https://fisheries.msc.org/en/fisheries/isf-iceland-cod/@@assessments [Accessed on 25.07.2026].
ICES, 2022. Icelandic Waters ecoregion – Ecosystem overview. In Report of the ICES Advisory Committee, 2022. ICES Advice 2022, Section 11.1, Available at https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.advice.21731663. [Accessed on 13.07.2026].
ICES, 2022. Icelandic Waters ecosystem – Fisheries overview. In Report of the ICES Advisory Committee, 2022. ICES Advice 2022, section 11.2. Available at https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.advice.21487635. [Accessed on 13.07.2026].
ICES, 2026. Northwestern Working Group (NWWG). ICES Scientific Reports. 08:37. 994 pp. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.32414577 [Accessed on 13.07.2026].
ICES, 2026. Cod (Gadus morhua) in Division 5.a (Iceland grounds). In Report of the ICES Advisory Committee, 2026. ICES Advice 2026, cod.27.5a. Available at https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.advice.30932021 [Accessed on 13.07.2026].
MFRI, 2024. Assessment Reports 2024: Cod, Gadus morhua. Marine and Freshwater Research Institute. Published 9 June 2024. Available at https://www.hafogvatn.is/static/extras/images/01-cod_techreport_en.html [Accessed on 25.07.2026].
MFRI, 2023. Assessment Reports 2023: Icelandic slope beaked redfish, Sebastes mentella. Marine and Freshwater Research Institute. Published 9 June 2023. Available at https://www.hafogvatn.is/static/extras/images/05-demersalsmentella_tr1388216.pdf [Accessed on 25.07.2023].
MFRI, 2023. State of Marine Stocks and Advice 2023: Cod, Gadus morhua. Marine and Freshwater Research Institute. Published 9 June 2023. Available at https://www.hafogvatn.is/static/extras/images/01-cod1390313.pdf [Accessed on 25.07.2023].
Pham, C., Diogo, H., Menezes, G., Porteiro, F., Braga-Henriques, A., Vandeperre F. and Morato, T., 2014. Deep-water longline fishing has reduced impact on Vulnerable Marine Ecosystems. Sci Rep 4, 4837. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep04837.
Reeves, S. A., Bell, J. B., Cambie, G., Davie, S. L., Dolder, P., Hyder, K., Pontalier, H., Radford Z. and Vaughan, D., 2018. An international review of fisheries management regimes. Cefas. Issued 2 August 2018. Available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341549803_A_review_of_international_fisheries_management_regimes
Sustainable swaps
Learn more about how we calculate our sustainability ratings.
How our ratings work
Add impact to your inbox
Join the movement: get updates on the issues you care about.
We'll email you inspiring stories about the work we're doing to save and recover our oceans, and news about our urgent campaigns for positive change.